🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, may align so closely with the mythologized version promoted by official channels that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to craft a tailor-made persona of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last October, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the message is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged Putin to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with many contenders. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, including a reformer later murdered and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who studied his rise, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the process stated the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by the actor's arrival as 007. The grittier interpretation prompted local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. Its omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

Domestically, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. His influence is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.